Writing College and Career Readiness Standards
These Standards describe what students who score in specific score ranges on the writing section of the ACT® college readiness assessment are likely to know and be able to do.
Note: Scores below 3 do not permit useful generalizations about students’ writing abilities.
View or print the set of Writing Standards (PDF, 5 pages) and Writing Curriculum Review Worksheets (PDF, 5 pages).
Score Range 9-10
Score Range 11-12
Ideas and Analysis
(I&A)
I&A 201. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Generate a thesis that is unclear or not
entirely related to the given issue
- Respond weakly to other perspectives on
the issue
I&A 202. Analyzing critical elements of an issue
and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Provide
analysis that is incomplete or largely irrelevant
I&A 301. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Generate a somewhat clear thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
- Respond to other perspectives on the issue
I&A 302. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Establish a limited or tangential context for analysis
- Provide analysis that is simplistic or somewhat unclear
I&A 401. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Generate a clear thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
- Engage with other perspectives on the issue
I&A 402. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Establish and employ a relevant context for analysis
- Recognize implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions
I&A 501. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Generate a precise thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
- Engage productively with other perspectives on the issue
I&A 502. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Establish and employ a thoughtful context for analysis
- Address implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions
I&A 601. Understanding the task and writing with purpose.
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Generate a nuanced, precise thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
- Engage critically with other perspectives on the issue
I&A 602. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Establish and employ an insightful context for analysis
- Examine implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions
Development and Support (D&S)
D&S 201. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Arrive at a weak understanding of the issue and differing perspectives on it through inadequate reasoning and examples
- Offer a rationale that fails to clarify the argument
- Provide elaboration of ideas and analysis that is illogical, disjointed, or circular
D&S 301. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make use of mostly relevant reasoning and examples to support the thesis and arrive at a general or simplistic understanding of the issue
- Offer a rationale that largely clarifies the argument
- Provide elaboration of ideas and analysis that is somewhat repetitive or imprecise
D&S 401. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make use of clear reasoning and examples to arrive at an understanding of the issue and differing perspectives on it
- Adequately convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
- Extend ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
- Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument
D&S 501. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make purposeful use of reasoning and examples to support the thesis and arrive at a deeper understanding of the issue
- Capably convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
- Enrich ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
- Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument
D&S 601. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make skillful use of reasoning and examples to broaden the context for analysis, support the thesis, and arrive at deeper insight into the issue
- Effectively convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
- Enrich and strengthen ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
- Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument
Organization (ORG)
ORG 201. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Group ideas with little consistency or clarity
- Use misleading and poorly formed transitions
ORG 202. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Provide a minimal organizational structure in which some ideas are grouped locally
ORG 301. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Group most ideas logically
- Use transitions between and within paragraphs to clarify some relationships among ideas
ORG 302. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Provide a basic organizational structure
ORG 401. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Group and sequence ideas logically
- Use transitions between and within paragraphs to clarify relationships among ideas
ORG 402. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make use of an emergent controlling idea or purpose to shape the argument
ORG 501. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Group and sequence ideas logically to increase the effectiveness of the argument
- Use transitions between and within paragraphs to consistently clarify relationships among ideas
ORG 502. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make use of a controlling idea or purpose to unify the argument
ORG 601. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Group and sequence ideas logically, creating a progression that increases the effectiveness of the argument
- Use transitions between and within paragraphs to strengthen the relationships among ideas
ORG 602. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make use of a controlling idea or purpose to unify and focus the argument
Language Use and Conventions (L&C)
L&C 201. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make word choices that are rudimentary and frequently imprecise
- Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are inconsistent and are not always appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 202. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Compose sentences that sometimes have clear structures
- Produce writing that has distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics and only sometimes conveys meaning clearly
L&C 301. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Make word choices that are general and occasionally imprecise
Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are not always appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 302. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Compose sentences that usually have clear structures but show little variety
- Produce writing that has distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics but, in most instances, conveys meaning clearly
L&C 401. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make adequate word choices that convey the argument with clarity
- Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 402. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Compose sentences with clear and occasionally varied structures
Produce writing that has errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics but conveys meaning clearly
L&C 501. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Make precise word choices that work in service of the argument
- Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are effective for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 502. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Compose sentences with clear and often varied structures
- Produce writing that has only minor errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics
L&C 601. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Make skillful and precise word choices that enhance the argument
Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are strategic and effective for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 602. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
- Compose sentences with clear and consistently varied structures
- Produce writing that is free of all but a few minor errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics