Writing College and Career Readiness Standards
These Standards describe what students who score in specific score ranges on the writing section of the ACT® college readiness assessment are likely to know and be able to do.
Note: Scores below 3 do not permit useful generalizations about students’ writing abilities.
View or print the set of Writing Standards (PDF, 5 pages) and Writing Curriculum Review Worksheets (PDF, 5 pages).
Score Range 9-10
Score Range 11-12
Ideas and Analysis 
(I&A) 
I&A 201. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Generate a thesis that is unclear or not 
entirely related to the given issue 
  - Respond weakly to other perspectives on 
the issue 
I&A 202. Analyzing critical elements of an issue 
and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Provide 
analysis that is incomplete or largely irrelevant 
 
I&A 301. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Generate a somewhat clear thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
 
  - Respond to other perspectives on the issue
 
I&A 302. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Establish a limited or tangential context for analysis
 
  - Provide analysis that is simplistic or somewhat unclear 
 
I&A 401. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Generate a clear thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
 
  - Engage with other perspectives on the issue
 
I&A 402. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Establish and employ a relevant context for analysis
 
  - Recognize implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions 
 
I&A 501. Understanding the task and writing with purpose
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Generate a precise thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
 
  - Engage productively with other perspectives on the issue
 
I&A 502. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Establish and employ a thoughtful context for analysis
 
  - Address implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions 
 
I&A 601. Understanding the task and writing with purpose.
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Generate a nuanced, precise thesis that establishes a perspective on a contemporary issue
 
  - Engage critically with other perspectives on the issue
 
I&A 602. Analyzing critical elements of an issue and differing perspectives on it
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Establish and employ an insightful context for analysis
 
  - Examine implications, complexities and tensions, and/or underlying values and assumptions 
 
Development and Support (D&S)
D&S 201. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Arrive at a weak understanding of the issue and differing perspectives on it through inadequate reasoning and examples
 
  - Offer a rationale that fails to clarify the argument
 
  - Provide elaboration of ideas and analysis that is illogical, disjointed, or circular
 
D&S 301. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make use of mostly relevant reasoning and examples to support the thesis and arrive at a general or simplistic understanding of the issue
 
  - Offer a rationale that largely clarifies the argument
 
  - Provide elaboration of ideas and analysis that is somewhat repetitive or imprecise
 
D&S 401. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make use of clear reasoning and examples to arrive at an understanding of the issue and differing perspectives on it
 
  - Adequately convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
 
  - Extend ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
 
  - Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument 
 
D&S 501. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make purposeful use of reasoning and examples to support the thesis and arrive at a deeper understanding of the issue
 
  - Capably convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
 
  - Enrich ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
 
  - Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument 
 
D&S 601. Building and strengthening the argument
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make skillful use of reasoning and examples to broaden the context for analysis, support the thesis, and arrive at deeper insight into the issue
 
  - Effectively convey reasons why the argument is worth considering
 
  - Enrich and strengthen ideas and analysis by considering factors that complicate the writer’s own perspective
 
  - Anticipate objections by qualifying the argument 
 
Organization (ORG)
ORG 201. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Group ideas with little consistency or clarity
 
  - Use misleading and poorly formed transitions
 
ORG 202. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Provide a minimal organizational structure in which some ideas are grouped locally 
 
ORG 301. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Group most ideas logically
 
  - Use transitions between and within paragraphs to clarify some relationships among ideas
 
ORG 302. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Provide a basic organizational structure 
 
ORG 401. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Group and sequence ideas logically
 
  - Use transitions between and within paragraphs to clarify relationships among ideas
 
ORG 402. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make use of an emergent controlling idea or purpose to shape the argument 
 
ORG 501. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Group and sequence ideas logically to increase the effectiveness of the argument
 
  - Use transitions between and within paragraphs to consistently clarify relationships among ideas
 
ORG 502. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make use of a controlling idea or purpose to unify the argument 
 
ORG 601. Grouping and connecting ideas
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Group and sequence ideas logically, creating a progression that increases the effectiveness of the argument
 
  - Use transitions between and within paragraphs to strengthen the relationships among ideas
 
ORG 602. Employing an organizational strategy
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make use of a controlling idea or purpose to unify and focus the argument 
 
Language Use and Conventions (L&C)
L&C 201. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make word choices that are rudimentary and frequently imprecise
 
  - Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are inconsistent and are not always appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
 
L&C 202. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Compose sentences that sometimes have clear structures
 
  - Produce writing that has distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics and only sometimes conveys meaning clearly 
 
L&C 301. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Make word choices that are general and occasionally imprecise
Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are not always appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 302. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Compose sentences that usually have clear structures but show little variety
 
  - Produce writing that has distracting errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics but, in most instances, conveys meaning clearly 
 
L&C 401. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make adequate word choices that convey the argument with clarity
 
  - Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are appropriate for the given writing purpose and topic
 
L&C 402. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Compose sentences with clear and occasionally varied structures
Produce writing that has errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics but conveys meaning clearly 
L&C 501. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Make precise word choices that work in service of the argument
 
  - Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are effective for the given writing purpose and topic
 
L&C 502. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Compose sentences with clear and often varied structures
 
  - Produce writing that has only minor errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics 
 
L&C 601. Using language to enhance meaning
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
Make skillful and precise word choices that enhance the argument
Make stylistic choices, including voice, tone, and diction, that are strategic and effective for the given writing purpose and topic
L&C 602. Applying the conventions of standard written English
A score in this range indicates that the writer is able to:
  - Compose sentences with clear and consistently varied structures
 
  - Produce writing that is free of all but a few minor errors in grammar, usage, and mechanics